Monday, January 11, 2010

A lesson in subtlety: Newspapers rule and all other media suck my ass

As you can probably guess from hearing me rant about journalism, I'm an old-school newspaper purist. I don't trust any other form of media, nor do I have much faith in the capability of other media to achieve the same level of quality or serve the same vital watchdog role as newspapers.

So you can imagine why I'm so depressed that newspapers are starting to suck.

Without quality newspapers, along with their vibrant staffing of superior reporters and funding for investigative projects, the state of American journalism is dead. The current downfall of print already is painful and debilitating, but you can bet that it will be much worse when we eventually rely solely on press release re-writes, gotcha celebrity drivel, weak oversight of our continually corrupt government and unskilled, agenda-driven Internet bloggers.

How can I know this? Simple concept: Newspapers drive American journalism. No other source of information plays such a crucial role in feeding other forms of media than print. In TV news, assignment editors are expected to read the newspaper to gather story ideas. Radio cites newspapers, and newspaper reporters are featured as expert witnesses to the dealings of the day. Internet journalism -- a phrase I use in the loosest possible sense -- would cease to exist in its current form without the luxury of linking to or quoting from newspaper stories.

Even if newspapers simply move their operations completely online, thus transforming Internet journalism, it's still hopeless until a miraculous new funding model can be introduced. Online revenue models for newspapers don't begin to make up for the advertising dollars that print sales used to provide, which in turn allowed for the kind of staffing and talent necessary to be the superior form of media in terms of quality. Currently, a majority of newspapers are giving away their content for free on the Internet. There surely needs to be something between free and profit that allows newspapers to thrive on the Web, and right now nobody seems to know what the hell that might be.

A story out today found that newspapers still provide a vast majority of the original local content, while the Internet only graced us with 6% of original reporting. The study also found that competing with the Internet -- that is, competing with a medium that provides its content for free -- is leading newspapers down a dangerous road of posting press release re-writes online just to get the information out quicker, and then sometimes not even updating or writing legitimate stories to follow up.

If you're unfamiliar with the concept of press release re-writes, let me give you a brief overview: It's a bullshit, lazy way to be a journalist. An organization sends the reporter a brief statement of "facts" that the journalist then re-writes in his or her own words without fact-checking or even really providing any original thought. The "story" is then regurgitated back to the masses as if actual journalism were done. This is the kind of reporting that has become necessary, according to the study, in order for newspapers to convince the American public that they are still relevant, in the sense that they are able to vomit out questionable material at a fast enough pace.

We can gather from all this that the Internet is not only killing newspapers -- it's actually destroying journalism. The daily newspaper model of researching and carefully crafting stories may not serve us in our give-it-to-me-now culture, but it damn well works out when it comes to providing quality, factual, reliable, credible information. Journalism schools don't really teach you to write; they teach you to think, question and analyze. We can only hope that those skills eventually fit in with the American desire for instant informational gratification.

Don't get me wrong -- I enjoy the luxury or reading my news online. But if a newspaper staff isn't writing it, and a city desk isn't editing it, and a copy desk isn't fact-checking it, then it's simply not credible for me. Working in the American newspaper industry has given me a certain perspective and expectation for quality journalism, and I'll stack it up to any other form of media in the world, hands down.


Gormanite said...

People are no longer interested in learning about what happened in the world. Now, people must know what is happening at this exact moment in time. The world-view of people is increasingly being shaped not by their own interpretation of the world, but instead of their meta-interpretation through the proxy of Twitteresque media. Those who want this instant feedback will keep consuming it, those who don't will scurry into the hills.

Newspapers presented a solid informational tone for many years, but their entertainment value has dropped. The long, drawn-out dinner table and bus stop discussions about the grander aspects of the world have been sidestepped by the zeitgeist. No longer do we care about the shapeless pundits residing in the darkening hallways of the Register-Guard. What is of now prime interest is the high-bandwidth emotional communication happening through video pundits and their ilk, along with the meta-analysis spread through the Twittersphere. Regardless if its 'correctness' is there or not, the quality of its emotional appeal leads this drivel to trumpet over the subtlety of the written word. Today's drivel is tomorrow's masterpiece. Here, let me wipe that drool from your chin.

It's an unstoppable feedback loop. The truth will adapt, as it always has. There will be the internet community of bloated facts, and there will be a holistic minority wrapped tightly around the interpersonal. In the end, relevancy is what you care about.

Anonymous said...

don't forget that the owners of media, newspapers or other, are wealthy people (think murdoch?) who have an agenda, usu. to maintain and expand their privilege, profits and power. this accounts for the narrow range of opinion in the media. chk my blog for more "enlightenment" on the subject

Anonymous said...

Hi there!
I would like to burn a theme at this forum. There is such a nicey, called HYIP, or High Yield Investment Program. It reminds of financial piramyde, but in rare cases one may happen to meet a company that really pays up to 2% daily not on invested money, but from real profits.

For quite a long time, I make money with the help of these programs.
I don't have problems with money now, but there are heights that must be conquered . I get now up to 2G a day , and my first investment was 500 dollars only.
Right now, I'm very close at catching at last a guaranteed variant to make a sharp rise . Turn to my blog to get additional info. [url=]Online Investment Blog[/url]

Vanessa said...

Everyone wants to hear it first. Everyone loves gossip. Unfortunately, not everyone cares if the content is true. And unfortunately, most people don't care enough to check the source of a story. There are many people writing online that take full advantage of all of these things.

Over time the online resources will sort themselves out into categories of repute. Just like the Star magazines that sell, there will always be the online equivalent. Maybe once the news sources put a price on their content, people will hold them accountable for what is published.

The gold standard in newspaper businesses may not translate to online media, if they aren't providing real news to the market of people who demand it, however slim.

The local news concept is changing, too. If you have time to check one newspaper online, chances are you're going to check the best one, not the local one. So you may lose a lot. Where's the Google 'local' section? Maybe I missed it.

Anonymous said...

Enticement casinos? study this wise to [url=]casino[/url] president and horseplay online casino games like slots, blackjack, roulette, baccarat and more at .
you can also combination during the order of our untrained [url=]casino[/url] plan for something at and substitute pursuit of in bona fide petulant moneyed !
another exquisiteness [url=]casino spiele[/url] impede of events is , because german gamblers, while well-wishing online casino bonus.

Angie said...

"We can gather from all this that the Internet is not only killing newspapers -- it's actually destroying journalism." enough said. Completely agree.